# Reasoning Quiz – 4

Four boys, Pawan, Mahesh, Chandu and Ravi, and four girls, Eti, Seema, Hina and Anita, are sitting around a circular table. Two girls and two boys are not facing the centre. No three girls are sitting together. Chandu is second to the left of Seema, who is not sitting next to Mahesh. Eti is third to the left of Anita and one of them is not facing the centre. Pawan is third to the right of Mahesh, who is facing the centre. Hina and Ravi are facing each other and both are not sitting next to Mahesh or Anita.

1. Who among the following is sitting between Mahesh and Ravi?
a) Pawan
b) Chandu
c) Hina
d) Anita
e) None of these

2. How many boys are sitting between Seema and Eti?
a) Three
b) Two
c) One
d) Can’t be determined
5) None of these

3. Who is sitting third to the left of Pawan?
a) Ravi
b) Mahesh
c) Hina
d) Eti
e) None of these

4. Which of the following groups of four students are not facing the centre?
a) Chandu, Ravi, Seema and Pawan
b) Eti, Seema, Pawan and Ravi
c) Pawan, Seema, Eti and Chandu
d) Pawan, Chandu, Anita and Seema
e) None of these

5. Who is sitting between Hina and Anita?
a) Eti
b) Pawan
c) Mahesh
d) Seema
e) None of these

Q(6 – 10) Study the following information to answer the given questions

Seven friends, viz Manjit, Navin, Parul, Hitesh, Tarun, Raghu and Sahil, are pursuing th
PhD in different subjects—Maths, History, Political Science, Chemistry, Economic, Accounts and Geography, but not necessarily in the same order. They study in three different universities, viz P and S. At least two friends study in the same university. Hitesh is studying Political Science university P. The one who is studying History is not from university S. Sahil is studying Geography in university Q with only Navin. Manjit is not studying Economics and is not from university P.Raghu is studying Accounts and is not from university P. Tarun is studying Chemistry but not from university P. No one studies Maths or Economics in university P.

6. Which of the following represents the group that studies in university S?
a) Hitesh, Navin
b) Parul, Raghu, Tarun
c) Manjit, Tarun
d) Tarun, Raghu, Manjit
5) None of these

7. Parul is studying in which of the following universities?
a) P
b) Q
c) S
d) Can’t be determined
e) None of these

8. Which of the following combinations is true?
a) Manjit—Economics—university S
b) Navin—History—university Q
c) Parul—History—university S
d) Tarun—Chemistry—university Q
e) None of these

9. Navin studies which subject in PhD?
a) History
b) Maths
c) Economics
d) Can’t be determined
e) None of these

10. Who among the following is studying History in PhD?
a) Navin
b) Parul
c) Raghu
d) Manjit
5) None of these

11.In the following questions, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given below than is/are definitely true.
Statements:- J = A, X ≥ T, T ≥ J, J ≥ I, Q ≥X
Conclusions:-

I.  T ≥ A    II.  I ≤ Q
a) If only conclusion I is true.
b) If only conclusion II is true.
c) If either conclusion I or II is true.
d) If neither conclusion I nor II is true.
e) If both conclusions I and II are true.

12. How many such pairs of letters are there in the word “STAMHOPE”, each of which has as many letters between them in the word, as they have between them in the English alphabetical series?
a) Two
b Four
c) Three
d) Five
e) None of these

13. In question given below four statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I
and II.You have to take the four given statements to be true (even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts.) Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.
Statements:
All sin are not ring. Some ring are not ramp.
Some ramp are not leek. All leek are wad.
Conclusions:
I. Some ramp not being wad is a possibility.
II. All sin are leek.

a) If only conclusion I follows.
b) If only conclusion II follows.
c) If either conclusion I or II follows.
d) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e) If both conclusions I and II follow.

14. In question given below four statements are followed by two conclusions numbered Iand II.You have to take the four given statements to be true(even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts).Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.
Statements:
All guilt are full. All full are grab.
Some grab are wimp. Some wimp are woe.
Conclusions:
I. Some woe not being wimp is a possibility.
II. All grab being full is a possibility.

a) If only conclusion I follows.
b) If only conclusion II follows.
c) If either conclusion I or II follows.
d) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e) If both conclusions I and II follow.

15. In the following question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of
the two conclusions I and II given below than is/are definitely true.
Statements:- Z > Y > X, W > V > U, W > X
Conclusions:-

I.  V > X       II.  U > Y